Speaker summary
35% 7 analyzed articles/videos 610 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Usha Vance results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Straw Man , and Tu Quoque , with Quote-first Misdirection as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 209 hits . Analysis detected 979.302 faulty-reasoning hits from 610 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of 5% (25,844 of 26,968 speakers). This Usha Vance is better (less manipulative) than 95.80% of the peer group. Usha Vance
Speaker details
Total words: 610
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.2% percentile 6.2% BS Score7 analyzed videos610 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 4.0% 4.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 18.6% 18.6% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 16.0% 16.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 6.9% 6.9% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 12.2% 12.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 3.1% 3.1% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 4.0% 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 0.0% Straw Man: Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 0.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 15.9% Tu Quoque: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 0.2% Optimism Bias: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 1.1% Anecdotal: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 2.5% Middle Ground: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst