Speaker summary
35% 16 analyzed articles/videos 269 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tulsi Gabbard results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.7% saturation with 110 hits . Analysis detected 703.353 faulty-reasoning hits from 269 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (25,348 of 28,364 speakers). This Tulsi Gabbard is better (less manipulative) than 89.40% of the peer group. Tulsi Gabbard
Speaker details
Total words: 269
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.6% percentile 9.6% BS Score16 analyzed videos269 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 17.6% 17.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 20.2% 20.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 20.4% 20.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 3.4% 3.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 6.0% 6.0% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 6.0% 6.0% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 18.6% 18.6% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 4.0% 4.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Speaker 20.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 20.2%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 15.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 5.3% Slippery Slope: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 1.7% Burden of Proof: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 0.4% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst