Speaker summary
58% 22 analyzed articles/videos 832 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Treasury Department results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Authority , and Overconfidence Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 25.6% saturation with 300.499 hits . Analysis detected 1,720.943 faulty-reasoning hits from 832 analyzed words across 22 articles, generating a BS Score of 6% and a BS Rank of 4% (25,175 of 26,155 speakers). This Treasury Department is better (less manipulative) than 96.30% of the peer group. Treasury Department
Speaker details
Total words: 832
Article count: 22
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.7% percentile 6.0% BS Score22 analyzed videos832 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 20.6% 20.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 9.7% 9.7% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 6.5% 6.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 3.0% 3.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Speaker 7.3% 7.3% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 5.1% 5.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 4.8% 4.8% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 25.6%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 11.1% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 4.6% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 4.0% Halo Effect: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Bandwagon: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 5.3% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Slippery Slope: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Special Pleading: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 0.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Burden of Proof: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 0.4% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst