Millions have signed up for Trump Accounts, but some families are still waiting for baby’s $1,000 44%

By Associated Press60%

7/22/2026, 11:24:58 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 28 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Halo Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 169 hits. Analysis detected 1,489 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,031 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 47.3% and a BS Rank of 44% (11,557 of 20,372 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 56.70% of the article peer group.

WASHINGTON (AP)  At a rally Wednesday, President Donald Trump touted the $1,000 babies can receive when their parents open Trump Accounts in their names, seed money that Trump says will help give them “a really fair shot at the American dream.” 
“Think of that. 
The government is finally giving money back to our children,” Trump said to the crowd gathered at a Georgia high school 
Some parents who opened accounts earlier this month for their babies say they’re still waiting for their money. 
The accounts went live July 4, two days before Trump rang the opening bells for the New York Stock Exchange and the Nasdaq from the Oval Office. 
The tax-advantaged accounts can be opened for any child under the age of 18, and more than 7 million accounts are already active, Trump said Wednesday. 
Babies born between January 1, 2025, and December 31, 2028 get $1,000 in seed money from the U.S. 
Treasury. 
Most of those families receive their $1,000 in one or two days, the Treasury Department said. 
After the Trump Accounts are set up, parents, relatives, friends and employers can contribute to them. 
Some billionaires have also pledged philanthropic contributions to the accounts. 
The money is turned over to private firms that invest it in index funds, a type of mutual fund that tracks the performance of the stock market. 
The money can’t be accessed until the child turns 18, and only then for specific purposes, such as going to school, opening a business or buying a home. 
At the rally Wednesday, Rick Jackson, Georgia’s GOP nominee for governor, said he would push for state lawmakers to match the $1,000 in seed money from the federal government. 
Jackson, a wealthy businessman and CEO of a healthcare company, said he believes Georgia lawmakers will support that, but “if they don’t, I will personally donate it myself.” 
Boosters of the program say it’s a chance to give more Americans a stake in the stock market. 
They hope it will stem the rising popularity of democratic socialists, who seek to raise taxes on corporations and wealthy people to ease the cost of things like food and healthcare for low-income and middle-class Americans. 
Some parents were told it could take 4 weeks for the deposit 
For babies born since Trump took office last year, $1,000 from the U.S. 
Treasury is supposed to kick off the accounts. 
While some parents report receiving the money, others said in interviews and on social media they’re still waiting for their $1,000. 
Masaki and Kristina McLellan, new parents from Bergen County, New Jersey, said in an interview they were wary of signing up for the accounts because they worried it was a promotional stunt for the president. 
But the $1,000 incentive persuaded the couple, whose daughter Maya was born in late March, to start an account anyway. 
Masaki McLellan said he applied for the account July 6. 
At first, the application was rejected, but the account was activated after he called the Trump Account hotline. 
He was told he’d see the money in the account in 10 days. 
Now, he says, he’s been told it will take up to four weeks. 
Kristina McLellan said she was disappointed it was taking so long to fund her daughter’s account. 
But the infant has multiple other investments already compounding for her. 
Maya’s parents have already started a 529 college savings plan and a custodial brokerage account for her. 
The Trump Account is the third investment account in the little girl’s name. 
“We definitely want to give her options for her future and make sure she can choose what she wants to do,” said McLellan, a studio director for a local news station, who returns from maternity leave next week. 
The Treasury Department emphasized the McLellans’ case is unusual and said only a sliver of those who apply need customer support. 
Treasury says most parents wait only 1 or 2 days 
The Treasury Department said that the lag between opening an account and receiving the seed funding constitutes “standard processing time, like receiving a tax refund,” and that the overwhelming majority of parents are waiting only one to two days. 
But the department likes to give parents a conservative estimate for how long it might take for the money to be transferred, such as the estimate of up to four weeks given to the McLellans. 
“Trump Accounts level the playing field by allowing every parent to invest in their children’s future, not just wealthy families with trust funds,” the department said. 
The government also unveiled an initiative last month that permits child welfare agencies to open accounts on behalf of foster youth. 
“With roughly 1 million sign-ups per month before launch, Trump Accounts have become the most popular and successful government-backed savings product in U.S. history,” the Treasury Department said. 
On Wednesday, Trump called the accounts “the most consequential” part of his signature tax and spending cuts bill, also known as the One Big Beautiful Bill. 
Trump faces pressure over his handling of the economy 
Trump’s stop in Georgia comes as he and fellow Republicans face pressure in the midterm elections for their handling of the economy. 
Only 33% of U.S. adults approve of Trump’s economic leadership, among the lower ratings of his second term, according to a June survey by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research. 
Trump pledged to lower costs, but his tariffs and the war in Iran have instead helped to increase prices. 
Trump Accounts are similar to baby bonds, championed by Democratic-led cities and states meant to shrink the wealth gap between low- and high-income children. 
But unlike most baby bonds, which generally target kids from disadvantaged backgrounds, Trump Accounts are available to families of all incomes. 
The program has faced criticism from those who say it does nothing to help families in a child’s first years of life, when children are most likely to experience poverty, homelessness and hunger. 
And the Republican bill that created the program also slashed funding for programs that are disproportionately used by children, including Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 9.2%Associated Press: 2.2%WCCB Charlotte: 3.1%Confirmation Bias9.2%This article: 3.4%Associated Press: 0.8%WCCB Charlotte: 2.7%Anchoring Bias3.4%This article: 7.3%Associated Press: 3.1%WCCB Charlotte: 3.1%Availability Heuristic7.3%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%WCCB Charlotte: 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%WCCB Charlotte: 0.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 2.7%Associated Press: 1.1%WCCB Charlotte: 3.6%Overconfidence Bias2.7%This article: 5.8%Associated Press: 7.3%WCCB Charlotte: 11.7%Framing Effect5.8%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%WCCB Charlotte: 0.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 2.0%Associated Press: 0.6%WCCB Charlotte: 0.7%Status Quo Bias2.0%This article: 1.7%Associated Press: 0.1%WCCB Charlotte: 0.6%Sunk Cost Effect1.7%This article: 11.9%Associated Press: 2.1%WCCB Charlotte: 4.6%Optimism Bias11.9%This article: 4.9%Associated Press: 1.4%WCCB Charlotte: 1.6%Pessimism Bias4.9%This article: 16.4%Associated Press: 8.7%WCCB Charlotte: 7.4%Negativity Bias16.4%This article: 7.3%Associated Press: 2.1%WCCB Charlotte: 3.3%Self-Serving Bias7.3%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%WCCB Charlotte: 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%WCCB Charlotte: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 3.5%Associated Press: 1.1%WCCB Charlotte: 1.7%In-Group Bias3.5%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%WCCB Charlotte: 1.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 7.6%Associated Press: 2.6%WCCB Charlotte: 2.5%Halo Effect7.6%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%WCCB Charlotte: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%WCCB Charlotte: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.4%Associated Press: 1.5%WCCB Charlotte: 1.1%Recency Bias3.4%This article: 2.5%Associated Press: 0.3%WCCB Charlotte: 0.8%Primacy Effect2.5%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%WCCB Charlotte: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%WCCB Charlotte: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 3.5%Associated Press: 0.2%WCCB Charlotte: 2.3%Straw Man3.5%This article: 7.3%Associated Press: 3.5%WCCB Charlotte: 8.1%Appeal to Authority7.3%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%WCCB Charlotte: 0.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.5%WCCB Charlotte: 0.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%WCCB Charlotte: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.8%Associated Press: 2.7%WCCB Charlotte: 4.2%Hasty Generalization4.8%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%WCCB Charlotte: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 2.5%Associated Press: 0.4%WCCB Charlotte: 2.6%Bandwagon2.5%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 4.6%WCCB Charlotte: 4.1%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 5.0%Associated Press: 0.6%WCCB Charlotte: 1.7%Begging the Question5.0%This article: 6.4%Associated Press: 2.3%WCCB Charlotte: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.4%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%WCCB Charlotte: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%WCCB Charlotte: 0.0%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%WCCB Charlotte: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%WCCB Charlotte: 0.0%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 5.2%Associated Press: 1.8%WCCB Charlotte: 4.0%Anecdotal5.2%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%WCCB Charlotte: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.0%Associated Press: 1.3%WCCB Charlotte: 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%WCCB Charlotte: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%WCCB Charlotte: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%WCCB Charlotte: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 2.7%Associated Press: 0.1%WCCB Charlotte: 0.9%Special Pleading2.7%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%WCCB Charlotte: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.3%WCCB Charlotte: 0.0%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.2%WCCB Charlotte: 0.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 2.7%Associated Press: 3.1%WCCB Charlotte: 0.9%Biased Writer Voice2.7%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.7%WCCB Charlotte: 0.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 4.9%Associated Press: 0.9%WCCB Charlotte: 1.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias4.9%This article: 3.5%Associated Press: 0.2%WCCB Charlotte: 1.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias3.5%This article: 4.1%Associated Press: 0.4%WCCB Charlotte: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.1%

1031 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers48%attributed speech540writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageTreasury Department • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageRick Jackson • 29 words • 0.0% coverageRick Jackson • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageMasaki McLellan • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageMasaki McLellan • 10 words • 0.0% coverageMasaki McLellan • 18 words • 0.0% coverageMasaki McLellan • 13 words • 0.0% coverageMasaki McLellan • 13 words • 0.0% coverageKristina McLellan • 16 words • 0.0% coverageKristina McLellan • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageKristina McLellan • 38 words • 0.0% coverageTreasury Department • 21 words • 0.0% coverageTreasury Department • 10 words • 0.0% coverageTreasury Department • 39 words • 0.0% coverageTreasury Department • 35 words • 0.0% coverageTreasury Department • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageTreasury Department • 28 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageAssociated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Donald Trump

100%flagged-word coverage
73 attributed words15% of attributed speech57% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Politically Left Leaning B-9.4 ptsWriter: 9.4%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -7.8 ptsWriter: 7.8%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -6.7 ptsWriter: 6.7%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.