Topic summary
59% 21 analyzed articles/videos 10,859 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Investment results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Authority , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 6,114 hits . Analysis detected 56,604 faulty-reasoning hits from 54,126 analyzed words across 21 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 22% (12,156 of 15,565 topics). This Investment is better (less manipulative) than 78.10% of the peer group. Investment
Topic details
Total words: 54,126
Article count: 21
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.9% percentile 2.0% BS Score21 analyzed articles54.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.3% 9.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 11.3% 11.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst