Speaker summary
55% 9 analyzed articles/videos 389.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tony Evers results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 35.9% saturation with 200.288 hits . Analysis detected 1,134.727 faulty-reasoning hits from 389.667 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (25,364 of 28,364 speakers). This Tony Evers is better (less manipulative) than 89.40% of the peer group. Tony Evers
Speaker details
Total words: 389.667
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.6% percentile 9.6% BS Score9 analyzed videos389.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 35.9% 35.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 24.4% 24.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 5.6% 5.6% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 12.2% 12.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 17.2% 17.2% Circular Reasoning Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 9.3% 9.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 7.7% 7.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 13.3% 13.3% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Speaker 8.5% 8.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 35.9%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Speaker 17.2%, sitewide 26.9% In-Group Bias: Speaker 24.4%, sitewide 6.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 6.0% Bandwagon: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 11.1% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 0.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 2.0% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 2.5% Middle Ground: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 0.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Primacy Effect: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst