Speaker summary
66% 10 analyzed articles/videos 1,205.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tom Steyer results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Overconfidence Bias , and Self-Serving Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 19% saturation with 267.807 hits . Analysis detected 2,936.556 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,205.333 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 2% (27,932 of 28,364 speakers). This Tom Steyer is better (less manipulative) than 98.50% of the peer group. Tom Steyer
Speaker details
Total words: 1,205.333
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.5% percentile 4.1% BS Score10 analyzed videos1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 2.5% 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 10.6% 10.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 10.0% 10.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 7.3% 7.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 4.8% 4.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.1% 1.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 10.0% 10.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 19.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 4.6% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst