Speaker summary
⁠72%6 analyzed articles/videos359.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tim Miller results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 40.9% saturation with 179 hits. Analysis detected 842 faulty-reasoning hits from 359.5 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 13.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (23,006 of 28,364 speakers). This Tim Miller is better (less manipulative) than 81.10% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

19% percentile
025507510018.9% percentile
13.4% BS Score6 analyzed videos359.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 40.9%40.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 32.0%32.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 5.7%5.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 26.3%26.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 12.8%12.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 19.6%19.6%Blind-Spot BiasSitewide 0.2%Speaker 7.1%7.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 11.2%11.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 3.0%3.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 7.1%7.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 40.9%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 32.0%, sitewide 5.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 26.3%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 19.6%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 18.5%, sitewide 19.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 4.6%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 1.7%Blind-Spot Bias: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos