Author summary
73% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,397 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adrian Carrasquillo results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 2,309 hits . Analysis detected 17,840 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,614 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 37% (4,038 of 6,359 authors). This Adrian Carrasquillo is better (less manipulative) than 63.50% of the peer group. Adrian Carrasquillo
Author details
Total words: 18,614
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.5% percentile 2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles18.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.1% 10.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 12.4% 12.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.6% 5.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst