Speaker summary
43% 9 analyzed articles/videos 255.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Thomas Tuchel results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Slippery Slope , Negativity Bias , and Pessimism Bias , with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 19.5% saturation with 88 hits . Analysis detected 525.441 faulty-reasoning hits from 255.667 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 7% and a BS Rank of 6% (26,779 of 28,364 speakers). This Thomas Tuchel is better (less manipulative) than 94.40% of the peer group. Thomas Tuchel
Speaker details
Total words: 255.667
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.6% percentile 7.0% BS Score9 analyzed videos255.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 19.5% 19.5% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 17.2% 17.2% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 15.1% 15.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 12.4% 12.4% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Speaker 7.1% 7.1% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 6.3% 6.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 9.8% 9.8% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 7.5% 7.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 1.3% 1.3% Blind-Spot Bias Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 19.5%, sitewide 0.8% Negativity Bias: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 19.2% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 17.2%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Speaker 15.1%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 5.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 2.7% Red Herring: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 0.7% Halo Effect: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 6.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Blind-Spot Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 0.2% Recency Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Tu Quoque: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 0.2% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 1.4% False Dilemma: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 1.5% Personal Incredulity: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 0.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst