Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Nina Lloyd results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 285 hits . Analysis detected 2,309 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,228 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Nina Lloyd is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Nina Lloyd
Author details
Total words: 2,228
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.6% 7.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.3% 12.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 12.8% 12.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.1% 10.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.1% 2.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 5.4% 5.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.1%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Author 12.8%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.4%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.1% Burden of Proof: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst