Speaker summary
⁠65%5 analyzed articles/videos586.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ted Sarandos results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Appeal to Authority, and Self-Serving Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 43.1% saturation with 331.305 hits. Analysis detected 1,665.702 faulty-reasoning hits from 586.667 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠7% (26,645 of 28,364 speakers). This Ted Sarandos is better (less manipulative) than 93.90% of the peer group.
Ted Sarandos
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

6% percentile
02550751006.1% percentile
7.3% BS Score5 analyzed videos586.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 43.0%43.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 4.1%4.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 15.6%15.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 5.4%5.4%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 9.0%9.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 10.8%10.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 2.3%2.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 6.3%6.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 10.4%10.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Speaker 43.0%, sitewide 6.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 15.6%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 1.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 0.4%Slippery Slope: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 0.3%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Tu Quoque: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 0.2%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos