Speaker summary
48% 42 analyzed articles/videos 1,369.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Susan Collins results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 318 hits . Analysis detected 2,581.609 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,369.667 analyzed words across 42 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 2% (26,337 of 26,730 speakers). This Susan Collins is better (less manipulative) than 98.50% of the peer group. Susan Collins
Speaker details
Total words: 1,369.667
Article count: 42
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.5% percentile 4.1% BS Score42 analyzed videos1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 4.6% 4.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 8.8% 8.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 7.2% 7.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 8.3% 8.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 2.8% 2.8% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 5.7% 5.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 5.4% 5.4% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 4.9% 4.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 1.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 6.7% Begging the Question: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 5.3% Ad Hominem: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Primacy Effect: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Burden of Proof: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst