Trump pushes ICE to continue traffic stops after fatal shootings 46%

By Rebecca Santana20% Patrick Whittle39% Associated Press60%

7/15/2026, 11:18:58 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Self-Serving Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 31.4% saturation with 250 hits. Analysis detected 1,792 faulty-reasoning hits from 795 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 47.9% and a BS Rank of 46% (11,997 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 54.80% of the article peer group.

President Donald Trump wants Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers to keep pulling over vehicles, signaling his opposition Wednesday to plans announced just a day earlier to suspend most traffic stops following another string of fatal shootings. 
It’s not clear whether ICE will quickly reverse course and resume most stops, which have been a key tool in Trump’s immigration crackdown. 
Ending those stops, Trump wrote, would be “playing right into the criminal’s hands.” 
“We CANNOT give up one of ICE’s most important and effective Crime Fighting tools, THE TRAFFIC STOP!” 
Trump wrote Wednesday on his social media site. 
Hours after Trump made his views known, Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin issued his own statement saying people illegally in the country would be “arrested and deported wherever they are.” 
But Mullin didn’t say whether ICE officers will be allowed to carry out traffic stops. 
READ MORE: Trump administration orders ICE to suspend most vehicle stops after two deadly shootings 
ICE’s enforcement tactics are coming under renewed criticism after three people died during encounters with federal officers within roughly a week. 
In Florida, a 28-year-old man was killed Tuesday after he was hit by a tractor trailer while running from immigration and other federal officers, authorities said. 
Before that, two motorists were shot and killed by ICE officers  one in Texas last week and another in Maine on Monday. 
After the Maine killing, Trump administration officials told ICE officers to suspend most vehicle stops, people familiar with the decision said Tuesday. 
Since the immigration crackdown began, federal officers confronting drivers have opened fire several times, saying the drivers’ vehicles had posed a danger. 
Policing experts have long said that shooting into moving cars presents a danger of its own and should almost always be avoided. 
There have been at least 10 deaths involving encounters with immigration agents since Trump launched his deportation campaign. 
At least four of them involved people in vehicles, a trend so troubling that U.S. 
Sen. 
Susan Collins, R-Maine, said Tuesday that she had urged Department of Homeland Security leaders “to cease all non-urgent vehicle stops.” 
SEE ALSO: Report: ICE detainees at Camp East Montana report frequent beatings, other human rights abuses 
ICE has been under pressure to beef up arrest and deportation numbers. 
It says people being sought are increasingly staying in their homes, and it often blames immigration advocates who advise immigrants to stay in homes unless ICE produces a warrant signed by an independent judge. 
ICE officers say that means they’re forced to find other ways to make arrests. 
DHS says the man killed in Maine came to the U.S. illegally 
Hundreds of people in Maine protested Tuesday over the fatal shooting of Johan Sebastián Durán Guerrero, a 25-year-old Colombian national. 
Advocacy groups said he was authorized to work in the United States. 
Durán Guerrero had illegally entered the U.S. on Sept. 1, 2023, through the southern border, DHS said Wednesday. 
Sen. 
Angus King, I-Maine, said the Homeland Security secretary told him on Monday that ICE officers were in Biddeford to serve an arrest warrant but that it wasn’t for the person who was shot. 
DHS said agents were surveilling an address for a person with a final order of removal from the country. 
When ICE tried to stop a vehicle driven by someone who came from that address, the “vehicle attempted to flee the scene and, fearing for public safety, an officer discharged his weapon,” the department said. 
It its statement Wednesday, DHS said Guerrero was released into the U.S. after crossing the border. 
The department didn’t answer questions about the agent who shot him. 
Photos showed bullet holes in Durán Guerrero’s car windshield, but the officers involved in the shooting didn’t have body cameras, leaving many questions. 
Among them are how close the officer was to the vehicle when shooting, whether officers told Durán Guerrero to stop and why ICE believes he had put the public in danger. 
Maine shooting puts a spotlight on ICE 
In a scathing post on X, outgoing Colombian President Gustavo Petro called the shooting a targeted killing “at the hands of the U.S. government.” 
Petro, who has openly quarreled with Trump, urged Trump to provide an explanation and accused ICE officers of treating Durán Guerrero as “an inferior being without rights.” 
In Wednesday’s social media post, Trump told ICE to be “judicious, fair and smart, and go back and do your very important job.” 
Border czar Tom Homan told reporters Tuesday that the investigation needs to play out and that officers will be held accountable if they are found to have acted inappropriately or illegally. 
The post Trump pushes ICE to continue traffic stops after fatal shootings appeared first on El Paso Matters . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.9%Rebecca Santana: 2.2%El Paso Matters: 1.8%Confirmation Bias4.9%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Santana: 0.0%El Paso Matters: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 14.2%Rebecca Santana: 3.5%El Paso Matters: 1.9%Availability Heuristic14.2%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Santana: 0.5%El Paso Matters: 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Santana: 0.0%El Paso Matters: 0.1%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Santana: 0.8%El Paso Matters: 0.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%Rebecca Santana: 9.7%El Paso Matters: 5.0%Framing Effect3.8%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Santana: 0.4%El Paso Matters: 0.7%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 2.5%Rebecca Santana: 1.1%El Paso Matters: 0.6%Status Quo Bias2.5%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Santana: 0.4%El Paso Matters: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 3.9%Rebecca Santana: 1.7%El Paso Matters: 2.0%Optimism Bias3.9%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Santana: 0.6%El Paso Matters: 0.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 31.4%Rebecca Santana: 12.8%El Paso Matters: 4.9%Negativity Bias31.4%This article: 15.3%Rebecca Santana: 2.5%El Paso Matters: 1.3%Self-Serving Bias15.3%This article: 1.5%Rebecca Santana: 0.3%El Paso Matters: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error1.5%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Santana: 0.0%El Paso Matters: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 3.0%Rebecca Santana: 0.7%El Paso Matters: 0.5%In-Group Bias3.0%This article: 3.4%Rebecca Santana: 0.3%El Paso Matters: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias3.4%This article: 2.9%Rebecca Santana: 0.9%El Paso Matters: 1.6%Halo Effect2.9%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Santana: 0.5%El Paso Matters: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Santana: 0.0%El Paso Matters: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 13.8%Rebecca Santana: 2.8%El Paso Matters: 0.8%Recency Bias13.8%This article: 2.9%Rebecca Santana: 0.8%El Paso Matters: 0.1%Primacy Effect2.9%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Santana: 0.0%El Paso Matters: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%Rebecca Santana: 0.6%El Paso Matters: 0.2%Ad Hominem3.4%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Santana: 0.0%El Paso Matters: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 28.4%Rebecca Santana: 6.0%El Paso Matters: 2.3%Appeal to Authority28.4%This article: 7.2%Rebecca Santana: 1.7%El Paso Matters: 0.9%False Dilemma7.2%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Santana: 0.0%El Paso Matters: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Santana: 0.0%El Paso Matters: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.5%Rebecca Santana: 2.3%El Paso Matters: 2.3%Hasty Generalization5.5%This article: 3.9%Rebecca Santana: 0.4%El Paso Matters: 0.2%Red Herring3.9%This article: 2.5%Rebecca Santana: 0.8%El Paso Matters: 0.3%Bandwagon2.5%This article: 13.3%Rebecca Santana: 4.4%El Paso Matters: 4.5%Appeal to Emotion13.3%This article: 4.7%Rebecca Santana: 1.0%El Paso Matters: 0.5%Begging the Question4.7%This article: 9.6%Rebecca Santana: 2.1%El Paso Matters: 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)9.6%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Santana: 0.0%El Paso Matters: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Santana: 0.3%El Paso Matters: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Santana: 0.2%El Paso Matters: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Santana: 0.0%El Paso Matters: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 7.7%Rebecca Santana: 3.0%El Paso Matters: 2.0%Anecdotal7.7%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Santana: 0.0%El Paso Matters: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 12.2%Rebecca Santana: 2.1%El Paso Matters: 1.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)12.2%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Santana: 0.0%El Paso Matters: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Santana: 0.0%El Paso Matters: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Santana: 0.0%El Paso Matters: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Santana: 0.0%El Paso Matters: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Santana: 0.0%El Paso Matters: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Santana: 0.4%El Paso Matters: 0.9%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 5.2%Rebecca Santana: 1.4%El Paso Matters: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection5.2%This article: 4.0%Rebecca Santana: 0.8%El Paso Matters: 1.1%Biased Writer Voice4.0%This article: 5.0%Rebecca Santana: 1.0%El Paso Matters: 1.6%Indoctrination5.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Santana: 1.0%El Paso Matters: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.9%Rebecca Santana: 1.3%El Paso Matters: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias2.9%This article: 6.3%Rebecca Santana: 0.6%El Paso Matters: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…6.3%

795 words analyzed.

Speakers

9speakers46%attributed speech429writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageTrump • 13 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageMarkwayne Mullin • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageSusan Collins • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageICE • 34 words • 0.0% coverageICE officers • 14 words • 0.0% coverageDHS • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageDHS • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageAngus King • 33 words • 0.0% coverageDHS • 19 words • 0.0% coverageICE • 35 words • 0.0% coverageDHS • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageGustavo Petro • 24 words • 100.0% coverageGustavo Petro • 27 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 23 words • 100.0% coverageTom Homan • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Trump

100%flagged-word coverage
53 attributed words14% of attributed speech84% writer coverage
0%40.0%80.0%Indoctrination+75.5 ptsWriter: 0.0%Trump: 75.5%75.5%Quote-first Misdirection+32.1 ptsWriter: 0.0%Trump: 32.1%32.1%Attempt to Sell a Product -11.7 ptsWriter: 11.7%Trump: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-7.5 ptsWriter: 7.5%Trump: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -5.4 ptsWriter: 5.4%Trump: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.