Speaker summary
42% 23 analyzed articles/videos 2,912.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sean Teare results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Overconfidence Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 467.21 hits . Analysis detected 3,028.35 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,912.333 analyzed words across 23 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 1% (28,255 of 28,364 speakers). This Sean Teare is better (less manipulative) than 99.60% of the peer group. Sean Teare
Speaker details
Total words: 2,912.333
Article count: 23
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.4% percentile 2.5% BS Score23 analyzed videos2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 13.3% 13.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 2.0% 2.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Burden of Proof: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst