Author summary
72% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,655 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nicole Hensley results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Authority , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 21.9% saturation with 1,086 hits . Analysis detected 4,681 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,965 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 55% (3,006 of 6,628 authors). This Nicole Hensley is worse (more manipulative) than 54.70% of the peer group. Nicole Hensley
Author details
Total words: 4,965
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.7% percentile 2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 21.9% 21.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 10.0% 10.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.6% 6.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 21.9%, sitewide 7.5% Negativity Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.6%, sitewide 11.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 10.0%, sitewide 4.6% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.9%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.6%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst