Speaker summary
⁠82%5 analyzed articles/videos534.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Huckabee Sanders results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 31.8% saturation with 197.474 hits. Analysis detected 2,311.109 faulty-reasoning hits from 534.667 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 10.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠13% (24,704 of 28,364 speakers). This Sarah Huckabee Sanders is better (less manipulative) than 87.10% of the peer group.
Sarah Huckabee Sanders

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

13% percentile
025507510012.9% percentile
10.7% BS Score5 analyzed videos534.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 32.2%32.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 31.8%31.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 19.9%19.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 20.0%20.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 12.4%12.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 14.2%14.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 5.9%5.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 16.6%16.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 17.2%17.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 26.2%26.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Speaker 32.2%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 31.8%, sitewide 7.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 26.2%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 3.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 19.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 17.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 16.6%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 6.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 2.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 0.4%Straw Man: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 0.9%Bandwagon: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos