Speaker summary
⁠26%7 analyzed articles/videos399.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sam Neill's family results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 54 hits. Analysis detected 89 faulty-reasoning hits from 399.5 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠9% (25,982 of 28,364 speakers). This Sam Neill's family is better (less manipulative) than 91.60% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

8% percentile
02550751008.4% percentile
8.5% BS Score7 analyzed videos399.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 6.7%6.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 10.4%10.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 6.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos