Speaker summary
51% 10 analyzed articles/videos 1,559 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rubio results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 188 hits . Analysis detected 1,251 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,559 analyzed words across 10 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 1% (28,174 of 28,364 speakers). This Rubio is better (less manipulative) than 99.30% of the peer group. Rubio
Speaker details
Total words: 1,559
Content count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.7% percentile 3.0% BS Score10 analyzed videos1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 12.1% 12.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 7.8% 7.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 3.5% 3.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 10.3% 10.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.4% 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 5.7% 5.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 0.3% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
NTD 100% 6/3/2026, 3:31:17 AM