Author summary
46% 2 analyzed articles/videos 508 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Martina results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Negativity Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 317 hits . Analysis detected 1,702 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,527 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 58% (2,612 of 6,170 authors). This Michael Martina is worse (more manipulative) than 57.70% of the peer group. Michael Martina
Author details
Total words: 2,527
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.7% percentile 2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.5% 12.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 11.2% 11.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 12.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 11.2%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst