Speaker summary
74%6 analyzed articles/videos102.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rolling Stone results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 97.2% saturation with 136.111 hits. Analysis detected 434.023 faulty-reasoning hits from 102.667 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 34.1% and a BS Rank of 53% (13,107 of 27,590 speakers). This Rolling Stone is worse (more manipulative) than 52.50% of the peer group.
Rolling Stone
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

53% percentile
025507510052.5% percentile
34.1% BS Score6 analyzed videos102.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 97.2%97.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 69.9%69.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 36.5%36.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 25.9%25.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 16.7%16.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 8.8%8.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 8.8%8.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 8.8%8.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 97.2%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 69.9%, sitewide 6.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 36.5%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 25.9%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 1.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 8.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate