Author summary
22% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,018 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Kreps results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 720 hits . Analysis detected 5,973 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,376 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 35% (4,143 of 6,348 authors). This Daniel Kreps is better (less manipulative) than 65.30% of the peer group. Daniel Kreps
Author details
Total words: 7,376
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.7% percentile 2.1% BS Score6 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.6% 4.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.8% 9.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.3% 7.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 8.0%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst