Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 5,373 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jason Motlagh results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 1,614 hits . Analysis detected 12,901 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,119 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 26% (4,774 of 6,378 authors). This Jason Motlagh is better (less manipulative) than 74.80% of the peer group. Jason Motlagh
Author details
Total words: 16,119
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.2% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles16.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.8% 4.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 10.0% 10.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 10.0%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.3%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst