Speaker summary
48% 13 analyzed articles/videos 572 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rick Scott results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , False Dilemma , and Unattributed Quote , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 124 hits . Analysis detected 1,074.166 faulty-reasoning hits from 572 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 2% (27,979 of 28,364 speakers). This Rick Scott is better (less manipulative) than 98.60% of the peer group. Rick Scott
Speaker details
Total words: 572
Article count: 13
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.4% percentile 3.9% BS Score13 analyzed videos572 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 10.8% 10.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 3.6% 3.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 10.9% 10.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 3.0% 3.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 2.2% 2.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 12.1% 12.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 0.5% 0.5% Personal Incredulity Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 1.5% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 1.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% Loss Aversion: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Personal Incredulity: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 0.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Slippery Slope: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Nature: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst