Fact-checking Florida Republicans’ Sunshine State Showdown 9%

By Samantha Putterman0% Amy Sherman10%

6/27/2026, 12:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Availability Heuristic, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 135 hits. Analysis detected 964 faulty-reasoning hits from 917 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 25.2% and a BS Rank of 9% (20,090 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 91.80% of the article peer group.

HOLLYWOOD, Fla.  Florida Republicans billed their party’s June 27 gathering in South Florida as the "Sunshine State Showdown." 
But for U.S. 
Rep. 
Byron Donalds, the event’s headliner and GOP frontrunner for governor, it was less of a confrontation and more like a friendly chat. 
No other gubernatorial candidates met the party’s fundraising and polling criteria for a debate, and Donalds didn’t call for one. 
Donalds took the stage at the Seminole Hard Rock Hotel & Casino after a video clip of Charlie Kirk, the assassinated Turning Point USA founder, endorsing Donalds’ bid for governor. 
Donalds didn’t mention his opponents in his speech and took audience questions about the Second Amendment and his plans to lower homeowner’s insurance and protect the state’s water supply. 
His broad replies didn’t offer much opportunity for fact-checking. 
Of the gubernatorial candidates who attended, Florida Lt. 
Gov. 
Jay Collins took direct swipes at Donalds’ vulnerabilities, including his decades-old drug charge and campaign donations from a pro-AI super PAC. 
Former Florida House Speaker Paul Renner touted his actions shaping state law, including 2023 legislation he supported that restricted citizens from China and other "countries of concern" from owning or buying land in Florida. 
The Aug. 18 primary winner will likely face Democratic candidate David Jolly, a former congressman, in the general election. 
Speakers said little about the party’s withdrawn invitation to controversial governor candidate James Fishback, who held his own event nearby. 
They focused more on what unites them: personal freedom and disdain for New York politics. 
U.S. 
Sen. 
Ashley Moody didn’t mention her leading Democratic opponent Alexander Vindman but described New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani-backed congressional race winners as "anarchist psychos that want to destroy this country." 
Here, we fact-checked some of the speakers’ remarks. 
Collins: Donalds voted "against military pay raises." 
Collins cherry-picked some of Donalds’ votes against defense spending packages that authorized military pay raises, ignoring that Donalds voted for other measures that included them. 
PolitiFact rated a similar Collins statement Mostly False. 
The National Defense Authorization Act is a sweeping annual package that sets funding and policy for the U.S. 
Defense Department. 
While it includes military pay increases, the legislation is typically thousands of pages and authorizes billions in funding for a variety of military operations, and often has unrelated provisions tacked on. 
Donalds voted against the legislation in 2022, 2023 and 2025, saying he disagreed with provisions such as Ukraine funding and climate change initiatives. 
He supported the package with raises in 2021 and in 2024. 
Chief Financial Officer Blaise Ingoglia: Florida is "No. 1 in arresting and deporting criminal aliens in our communities." 
Florida is near the top for arrests, but it’s not No. 
1. 
(We don’t have similar data for deportations.) 
The state trails only Texas in arrests, according to Deportation Data Project records analyzed by The Associated Press. 
Through "Operation Tidal Wave"  the partnership between Florida’s state and local law enforcement agencies and federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement  agencies arrested more than 10,400 immigrants in the country illegally in Florida in 2025, according to state data. 
DeSantis said in January that another 9,600 arrests were made through 287g agreements, which allow state and local law enforcement to enforce certain federal immigration laws. 
Around 347 state and local agencies in Florida have signed these agreements, the most of any state. 
A Miami Herald analysis found that more than 4,800 of the approximately 20,000 people had only immigration violations, and no criminal charges or convictions. 
A quarter of those arrested had criminal convictions, and the rest had pending criminal charges that included nonviolent crimes. 
Data shows that ICE agents in Florida have made more immigration arrests so far in 2026 than in any other part of the U.S. 
As of March 10, the ICE field office in Miami  which covers Florida, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands  recorded about 120 arrests per day from Dec. 19, 2025, through March 10, or 9,880 arrests in total, The New York Times reported. 
U.S. 
Rep. 
Kat Cammack: "You should have to show an ID and you should have to be a citizen in order to vote." 
Voters already have to be U.S. citizens to cast ballots in federal elections. 
Cases of noncitizens voting are extremely rare. 
States set voter ID laws. 
Starting Jan. 1, 2027, the Florida Save Act will require voters to provide photo identification, such as an active U.S. passport or a state driver’s license, at the polls before voting. 
It prohibits the use of student and retirement center IDs. 
The law also requires new Florida driver’s licenses and state-issued ID cards to include citizenship status. 
It’s similar to the stalled SAVE America Act backed by Trump. 
U.S. 
Sen. 
Rick Scott: In Colombia’s recent presidential runoff, "They counted the ballots and announced within three hours," much faster than California’s primary election. 
Colombia does count ballots faster than California. 
But the two election setups are vastly different than Scott and others have described. 
Colombia’s election had just two candidates on the ballot. 
The election is administered nationally, and the country doesn’t have mail-in voting. 
California’s June 2 primary  where some race results have taken days or weeks to report  included several contests on the ballot. 
Counties administer the elections, and most California voters cast ballots by mail, which requires more time to process and verify. 
Sign up for our Florida Fact Focus newsletter here. 
RELATED: All of our fact-checks of Florida politicians including candidates for governor 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.9%Samantha Putterman: 2.0%@politifact: 2.0%Confirmation Bias2.9%This article: 3.2%Samantha Putterman: 1.1%@politifact: 0.6%Anchoring Bias3.2%This article: 11.0%Samantha Putterman: 2.5%@politifact: 2.5%Availability Heuristic11.0%This article: 13.5%Samantha Putterman: 2.8%@politifact: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic13.5%This article: 0.0%Samantha Putterman: 0.2%@politifact: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.8%Samantha Putterman: 0.8%@politifact: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias0.8%This article: 5.6%Samantha Putterman: 3.7%@politifact: 3.5%Framing Effect5.6%This article: 2.3%Samantha Putterman: 0.8%@politifact: 0.3%Loss Aversion2.3%This article: 0.0%Samantha Putterman: 0.2%@politifact: 0.2%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Putterman: 0.0%@politifact: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.1%Samantha Putterman: 0.2%@politifact: 0.8%Optimism Bias2.1%This article: 0.0%Samantha Putterman: 3.1%@politifact: 1.1%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 14.7%Samantha Putterman: 5.5%@politifact: 5.1%Negativity Bias14.7%This article: 0.0%Samantha Putterman: 0.0%@politifact: 0.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Putterman: 0.2%@politifact: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Putterman: 0.0%@politifact: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 2.3%Samantha Putterman: 0.8%@politifact: 0.5%In-Group Bias2.3%This article: 0.0%Samantha Putterman: 0.9%@politifact: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Putterman: 0.4%@politifact: 0.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Putterman: 0.0%@politifact: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Putterman: 0.0%@politifact: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.8%Samantha Putterman: 0.5%@politifact: 1.1%Recency Bias3.8%This article: 1.2%Samantha Putterman: 0.1%@politifact: 0.2%Primacy Effect1.2%This article: 0.0%Samantha Putterman: 0.0%@politifact: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Putterman: 0.7%@politifact: 0.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Putterman: 0.0%@politifact: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.9%Samantha Putterman: 5.1%@politifact: 4.7%Appeal to Authority4.9%This article: 2.4%Samantha Putterman: 0.9%@politifact: 0.8%False Dilemma2.4%This article: 0.0%Samantha Putterman: 1.6%@politifact: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Putterman: 0.0%@politifact: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.7%Samantha Putterman: 2.2%@politifact: 3.0%Hasty Generalization2.7%This article: 0.0%Samantha Putterman: 0.0%@politifact: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Putterman: 0.5%@politifact: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 3.3%Samantha Putterman: 2.9%@politifact: 2.4%Appeal to Emotion3.3%This article: 2.3%Samantha Putterman: 0.2%@politifact: 0.5%Begging the Question2.3%This article: 0.0%Samantha Putterman: 1.7%@politifact: 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Putterman: 0.0%@politifact: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.8%Samantha Putterman: 0.2%@politifact: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.8%This article: 0.0%Samantha Putterman: 0.0%@politifact: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Putterman: 0.8%@politifact: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.8%Samantha Putterman: 0.7%@politifact: 1.0%Anecdotal0.8%This article: 0.0%Samantha Putterman: 0.0%@politifact: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Putterman: 0.4%@politifact: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Putterman: 0.0%@politifact: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Putterman: 0.4%@politifact: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Putterman: 0.0%@politifact: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Putterman: 0.0%@politifact: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Putterman: 0.0%@politifact: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.3%Samantha Putterman: 1.7%@politifact: 1.7%Unattributed Quote2.3%This article: 7.7%Samantha Putterman: 1.9%@politifact: 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection7.7%This article: 9.1%Samantha Putterman: 1.0%@politifact: 1.6%Biased Writer Voice9.1%This article: 3.3%Samantha Putterman: 0.5%@politifact: 1.0%Indoctrination3.3%This article: 0.0%Samantha Putterman: 0.0%@politifact: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Putterman: 0.0%@politifact: 0.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.3%Samantha Putterman: 0.4%@politifact: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.3%

917 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers7.4%attributed speech849writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageJay Collins • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageBlaise Ingoglia • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageKat Cammack • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageRick Scott • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Rick Scott

100%flagged-word coverage
22 attributed words32% of attributed speech66% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+94.2 ptsWriter: 5.8%Rick Scott: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-9.8 ptsWriter: 9.8%Rick Scott: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-3.5 ptsWriter: 3.5%Rick Scott: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -2.5 ptsWriter: 2.5%Rick Scott: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.