Speaker summary
49% 7 analyzed articles/videos 305.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ras Baraka results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , False Dilemma , and Status Quo Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 26.2% saturation with 90.008 hits . Analysis detected 943.402 faulty-reasoning hits from 305.333 analyzed words across 7 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 8.3% and a BS Rank of 8% (26,145 of 28,364 speakers). This Ras Baraka is better (less manipulative) than 92.20% of the peer group. Ras Baraka
Speaker details
Total words: 305.333
Content count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.8% percentile 8.3% BS Score7 analyzed videos305.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 10.8% 10.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 14.4% 14.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 5.9% 5.9% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 12.4% 12.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 26.2% 26.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 9.7% 9.7% Actor-Observer Bias Sitewide 0.6% Speaker 9.1% 9.1% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 9.9% 9.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 9.5% 9.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 9.1% 9.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 26.2%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 19.2% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 1.5% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 9.1% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 0.8% Halo Effect: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 3.3% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 0.6% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% Loss Aversion: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 2.5% Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 6.0% Recency Bias: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 2.7% Red Herring: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 0.7% Begging the Question: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 5.3% Indoctrination: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 0.0% Middle Ground: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 0.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
NTD 100% 5/31/2026, 8:23:02 PM