Speaker summary
57% 13 analyzed articles/videos 1,275.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nirav Shah results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Slippery Slope , and False Dilemma , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 214.455 hits . Analysis detected 2,036.236 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,275.667 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 1% (27,270 of 27,519 speakers). This Nirav Shah is better (less manipulative) than 99.10% of the peer group. Nirav Shah
Speaker details
Total words: 1,275.667
Article count: 13
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.9% percentile 3.4% BS Score13 analyzed videos1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 3.6% 3.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 14.6% 14.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 5.6% 5.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 4.1% 4.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 3.5% 3.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 1.5% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Slippery Slope: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.6% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 3.1% Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst