Speaker summary
⁠48%3 analyzed articles/videos126.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New York City Police Department results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Burden of Proof, and Hasty Generalization, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 34.5% saturation with 67 hits. Analysis detected 286 faulty-reasoning hits from 126.5 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 21.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (18,746 of 28,364 speakers). This New York City Police Department is better (less manipulative) than 66.10% of the peer group.
New York City Police Department
Speaker details
Total words: 126.5
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

34% percentile
025507510033.9% percentile
21.1% BS Score3 analyzed videos126.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 34.0%34.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 34.5%34.5%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 22.2%22.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 15.5%15.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 19.1%19.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 13.9%13.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 34.5%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 34.0%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Speaker 22.2%, sitewide 0.4%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 4.6%Halo Effect: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos