Speaker summary
43%26 analyzed articles/videos853.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Netflix results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Halo Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 198 hits. Analysis detected 1,864.387 faulty-reasoning hits from 853.333 analyzed words across 26 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 2% (27,945 of 28,364 speakers). This Netflix is better (less manipulative) than 98.50% of the peer group.
Netflix

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

2% percentile
02550751001.5% percentile
4.0% BS Score26 analyzed videos853.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 9.1%9.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 6.6%6.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 10.2%10.2%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 5.8%5.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 3.2%3.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 0.6%0.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 4.6%4.6%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 6.3%6.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 3.3%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 0.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate