Speaker summary
⁠54%4 analyzed articles/videos1,337.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Monica Gandhi results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Emotion, with Quote-first Misdirection as the most egregious example at 26.1% saturation with 520 hits. Analysis detected 2,599.103 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,337.333 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠4% (27,310 of 28,364 speakers). This Monica Gandhi is better (less manipulative) than 96.30% of the peer group.
Monica Gandhi
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

4% percentile
02550751003.7% percentile
5.9% BS Score4 analyzed videos1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 26.1%26.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 4.5%4.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 20.0%20.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 4.7%4.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 9.6%9.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 7.9%7.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 10.5%10.5%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 5.5%5.5%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 6.2%6.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 26.1%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 2.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 4.6%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 0.8%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 0.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Begging the Question: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos