Speaker summary
53% 17 analyzed articles/videos 1,223 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mehmet Oz results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Burden of Proof , and Optimism Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 183.259 hits . Analysis detected 2,062.526 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,223 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 2% (27,671 of 28,182 speakers). This Mehmet Oz is better (less manipulative) than 98.20% of the peer group. Mehmet Oz
Speaker details
Total words: 1,223
Article count: 17
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.8% percentile 4.4% BS Score17 analyzed videos1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 7.3% 7.3% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 8.4% 8.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 3.4% 3.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 13.7% 13.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 5.3% 5.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 10.4% 10.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Burden of Proof: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 0.4% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 4.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Begging the Question: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 4.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst