Author summary
37% 1 analyzed article/video 1,815 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joseph James results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 539 hits . Analysis detected 3,001 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,445 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 45% (3,663 of 6,563 authors). This Joseph James is better (less manipulative) than 55.80% of the peer group. Joseph James
Author details
Total words: 5,445
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.2% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.8% 4.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.8% 6.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.9% 9.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.0% 4.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Loss Aversion: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst