Speaker summary
65% 11 analyzed articles/videos 709 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kirsten Gillibrand results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 173.388 hits . Analysis detected 1,371.675 faulty-reasoning hits from 709 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of 4% (27,402 of 28,364 speakers). This Kirsten Gillibrand is better (less manipulative) than 96.60% of the peer group. Kirsten Gillibrand
Speaker details
Total words: 709
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.4% percentile 5.6% BS Score11 analyzed videos709 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 13.7% 13.7% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 14.1% 14.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 9.9% 9.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 10.5% 10.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.9% 1.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 6.4% 6.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 12.9% 12.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 19.8% 19.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 19.8%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 19.2% False Dilemma: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 1.5% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 1.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 6.9% Indoctrination: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Recency Bias: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Straw Man: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 0.9% Loss Aversion: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 1.7% Red Herring: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 0.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Tu Quoque: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst