Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Taiyler S. Mitchell results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 415 hits. Analysis detected 2,642 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,958 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,244 authors). This Taiyler S. Mitchell is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Taiyler S. Mitchell
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Taiyler S. Mitchell (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 2,958
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.0%10.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.6%2.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.5%6.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 5.5%5.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.6%5.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.7%4.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 5.5%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Begging the Question: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Special Pleading: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.3%False Dilemma: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos