Speaker summary
56% 41 analyzed articles/videos 2,073.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Keir Starmer results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 348 hits . Analysis detected 3,301.396 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,073.667 analyzed words across 41 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 2% (26,552 of 26,884 speakers). This Keir Starmer is better (less manipulative) than 98.80% of the peer group. Keir Starmer
Speaker details
Total words: 2,073.667
Article count: 41
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.2% percentile 3.8% BS Score41 analyzed videos2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 9.4% 9.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 15.8% 15.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 10.3% 10.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 4.8% 4.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 2.1% 2.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 6.2% 6.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 3.6% 3.6% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 5.4% 5.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 15.8%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 6.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 6.0% Begging the Question: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst