Author summary
46% 1 analyzed article/video 719 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ted Hennessey results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Halo Effect , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 634 hits . Analysis detected 4,334 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,752 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 46% (3,584 of 6,530 authors). This Ted Hennessey is better (less manipulative) than 54.90% of the peer group. Ted Hennessey
Author details
Total words: 5,752
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.1% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.2% 10.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 11.0% 11.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 11.0%, sitewide 3.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst