Author summary
33% 5 analyzed articles/videos 969 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Max Goldbart results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Authority , and Negativity Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 15.3% saturation with 831 hits . Analysis detected 5,765 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,444 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 61% (2,560 of 6,436 authors). This Max Goldbart is worse (more manipulative) than 60.20% of the peer group. Max Goldbart
Author details
Total words: 5,444
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.2% percentile 3.0% BS Score5 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.5% 8.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 15.3% 15.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 12.2% 12.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 6.4% 6.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.5% 3.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 15.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 6.4%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst