Deadline⁠27%

Amazon Developing London Rave Scene Drama From Will Graha, Ed Lilly ⁠35%

By Max Goldbart⁠33%

7/15/2026, 6:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Halo Effect, and Anecdotal, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 58.7% saturation with 162 hits. Analysis detected 773 faulty-reasoning hits from 276 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 42.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (14,273 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 65.20% of the article peer group.

EXCLUSIVE: Amazon MGM Studios is developing a TV series about the underground rave scene in London, one of the first to come from its pact with Will Graham, Tonia Davis and Max Linsky’s Invitation Media. 
Industry director Ed Lilly is writing and directing Code, which is being produced by A League of Their Own co-creator Graham. 
Amazon isn’t confirming anything but we are told Code is set in the underground rave scene in London. 
It follows an American girl who runs away from her life in New York and falls in love with a young entrepreneur. 
Soon after, they decide to open their own club. 
One source described the series as “Industry meets One Day.” 
Casting is still to come and things are at an early stage, we are told. 
Writer-director Lilly’s credits include HBO-BBC’s Industry and Hulu’s Tell Me Lies, while he is developing a Netflix TV adaptation of Lucy Clarke's thriller The Surf House. 
Last year, Deadline revealed that Graham, ex-Higher Ground co-head Davis and Pineapple Street Studios co-founder Linsky’s Invitation Media had struck a TV deal with Amazon MGM Studios. 
Code is one of the first development projects to emerge from the deal, along with Spy Coast, which is based on Tess Gerritsen’s novel. 
On the movie side, Invitation is making Amazon's Vietnam War thriller Trust the Man with Daniel Radcliffe and Lucas Hedges, while it struck an audio partnership with the Washington Post. 
Graham previously worked with Amazon on A League of Their Own, which he co-created with Abbi Jacobson, and Daisy Jones & the Six. 
Amazon declined comment on Code. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.5%Max Goldbart: 3.5%Deadline: 2.4%Confirmation Bias6.5%This article: 3.3%Max Goldbart: 0.9%Deadline: 1.2%Anchoring Bias3.3%This article: 8.7%Max Goldbart: 3.7%Deadline: 3.1%Availability Heuristic8.7%This article: 3.6%Max Goldbart: 0.5%Deadline: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic3.6%This article: 0.0%Max Goldbart: 0.0%Deadline: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Max Goldbart: 0.9%Deadline: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 12.7%Max Goldbart: 8.1%Deadline: 6.5%Framing Effect12.7%This article: 0.0%Max Goldbart: 0.9%Deadline: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Max Goldbart: 0.6%Deadline: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Max Goldbart: 0.0%Deadline: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 8.0%Max Goldbart: 3.4%Deadline: 2.5%Optimism Bias8.0%This article: 5.4%Max Goldbart: 2.5%Deadline: 0.8%Pessimism Bias5.4%This article: 3.6%Max Goldbart: 8.5%Deadline: 6.7%Negativity Bias3.6%This article: 0.0%Max Goldbart: 0.0%Deadline: 2.1%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Max Goldbart: 0.0%Deadline: 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Max Goldbart: 0.0%Deadline: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Max Goldbart: 0.6%Deadline: 0.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Max Goldbart: 0.0%Deadline: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 28.6%Max Goldbart: 15.3%Deadline: 6.1%Halo Effect28.6%This article: 0.0%Max Goldbart: 0.3%Deadline: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Max Goldbart: 0.0%Deadline: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 9.8%Max Goldbart: 2.4%Deadline: 1.3%Recency Bias9.8%This article: 0.0%Max Goldbart: 0.0%Deadline: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 6.5%Max Goldbart: 0.3%Deadline: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias6.5%This article: 0.0%Max Goldbart: 0.3%Deadline: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Max Goldbart: 0.6%Deadline: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 58.7%Max Goldbart: 9.5%Deadline: 3.9%Appeal to Authority58.7%This article: 0.0%Max Goldbart: 0.0%Deadline: 0.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Max Goldbart: 0.3%Deadline: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Max Goldbart: 0.0%Deadline: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Max Goldbart: 5.0%Deadline: 3.5%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Max Goldbart: 0.0%Deadline: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Max Goldbart: 1.7%Deadline: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Max Goldbart: 2.8%Deadline: 3.6%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Max Goldbart: 0.3%Deadline: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Max Goldbart: 1.6%Deadline: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Max Goldbart: 0.0%Deadline: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 6.5%Max Goldbart: 0.3%Deadline: 0.5%Burden of Proof6.5%This article: 0.0%Max Goldbart: 0.0%Deadline: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Max Goldbart: 0.6%Deadline: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 26.8%Max Goldbart: 2.2%Deadline: 1.4%Anecdotal26.8%This article: 0.0%Max Goldbart: 0.0%Deadline: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 8.0%Max Goldbart: 2.0%Deadline: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)8.0%This article: 0.0%Max Goldbart: 0.0%Deadline: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Max Goldbart: 0.0%Deadline: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Max Goldbart: 0.0%Deadline: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Max Goldbart: 0.0%Deadline: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Max Goldbart: 0.9%Deadline: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 10.1%Max Goldbart: 6.4%Deadline: 2.9%Unattributed Quote10.1%This article: 16.3%Max Goldbart: 2.1%Deadline: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection16.3%This article: 36.2%Max Goldbart: 12.2%Deadline: 6.7%Biased Writer Voice36.2%This article: 0.0%Max Goldbart: 2.5%Deadline: 1.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Max Goldbart: 0.0%Deadline: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Max Goldbart: 0.0%Deadline: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 20.7%Max Goldbart: 2.1%Deadline: 2.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…20.7%

276 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers48%attributed speech144writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 100.0% coverageEd Lilly • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageEd Lilly • 26 words • 100.0% coverageDeadline • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageInvitation Media • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWill Graham • 23 words • 0.0% coverageAmazon MGM Studios • 5 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Invitation Media

100%flagged-word coverage
30 attributed words23% of attributed speech92% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Invitation Media: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-36.8 ptsWriter: 36.8%Invitation Media: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-31.3 ptsWriter: 31.3%Invitation Media: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-19.4 ptsWriter: 19.4%Invitation Media: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.