Keyword summary
69% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,833 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amazon Mgm Studios results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 1,103 hits . Analysis detected 7,648 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,332 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 57% (16,187 of 37,536 keywords). This Amazon Mgm Studios is worse (more manipulative) than 56.90% of the peer group. Amazon Mgm Studios
Keyword details
Total words: 7,332
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.9% percentile 3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.5% 8.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 15.0% 15.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 15.0%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.5% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst