Author summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video668 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Steven Morris results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 171 hits. Analysis detected 1,941 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,004 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (2,528 of 6,348 authors). This Steven Morris is worse (more manipulative) than 60.20% of the peer group.
Steven Morris
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠61%Steven Morris (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,004
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

60% percentile
025507510060.2% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.5%8.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.0%7.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.8%2.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.6%2.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.4%4.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.4%5.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.1%1.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.8%0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.1%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos