Author summary
â 90% 1 analyzed article/video 668 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Steven Morris results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Availability Heuristic , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 171 hits . Analysis detected 1,941 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,004 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of â 61% (2,528 of 6,348 authors). This Steven Morris is worse (more manipulative) than 60.20% of the peer group. Steven Morris
Author details
Total words: 2,004
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.2% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.5% 8.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.4% 5.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.1% 1.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.1%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst