Speaker summary
27% 7 analyzed articles/videos 1,413 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Patterson results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 4.1% saturation with 79 hits . Analysis detected 415.137 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,413 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 1% (28,340 of 28,364 speakers). This John Patterson is better (less manipulative) than 99.90% of the peer group. John Patterson
Speaker details
Total words: 1,413
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.1% percentile 1.6% BS Score7 analyzed videos1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 4.7% 4.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 4.2% 4.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 3.2% 3.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 1.2% 1.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Speaker 1.5% 1.5% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 0.4% 0.4% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Burden of Proof: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 0.4% Blind-Spot Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst