Speaker summary
27%7 analyzed articles/videos748 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joan Ericksen results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Overconfidence Bias, and Burden of Proof, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 15.6% saturation with 168 hits. Analysis detected 262 faulty-reasoning hits from 748 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.1% and a BS Rank of 4% (27,237 of 28,364 speakers). This Joan Ericksen is better (less manipulative) than 96.00% of the peer group.
Joan Ericksen
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

4% percentile
02550751004.0% percentile
6.1% BS Score7 analyzed videos748 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 15.6%15.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 4.5%4.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 2.2%2.2%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 15.6%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Burden of Proof: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 0.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide rateSpeaker rate