Author summary
62%1 analyzed article/video779 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Lee results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.8% saturation with 649 hits. Analysis detected 2,696 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,116 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 64% (2,314 of 6,288 authors). This Sarah Lee is worse (more manipulative) than 63.20% of the peer group.
Sarah Lee
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
64%Sarah Lee (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,116
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

63% percentile
025507510063.2% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.2%9.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.6%4.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.7%5.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.4%1.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 2.8%2.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.6%1.6%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Author 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 20.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.3%Bandwagon: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Circular Reasoning: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos