Publication summary
60% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,284 analyzed words
BS Summary: These HNGN - Headlines & Global News results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 859 hits . Analysis detected 4,479 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,631 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 75% (102 of 399 publications). This HNGN - Headlines & Global News is worse (more manipulative) than 74.60% of the peer group. HNGN - Headlines & Global News Publication details
Total words: 4,631
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.6% percentile 2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Publication SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 14.6% 14.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 4.1% 4.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 12.6% 12.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 5.7% 5.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 14.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 18.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 12.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Publication 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Sunk Cost Effect: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 0.3% Status Quo Bias: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst