Publication summary
87% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,858 analyzed words
BS Summary: These 92 Q results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 31.9% saturation with 2,552 hits . Analysis detected 14,562 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,993 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 88% (51 of 400 publications). This 92 Q is worse (more manipulative) than 87.50% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 7,993
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
88% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 87.5% percentile 4.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 31.9% 31.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 5.6% 5.6% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Publication 15.4% 15.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Publication 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.5% 3.5% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Publication 9.7% 9.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 8.5% 8.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 31.9%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Publication 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 23.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 8.5%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 15.4%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Ad Hominem: Publication 9.7%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Publication 8.7%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Publication 8.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 7.6%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Publication 7.3%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Publication 4.3%, sitewide 1.7% Horn Effect: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 1.0% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst