Speaker summary
55% 8 analyzed articles/videos 1,123 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jim Jordan results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Politically Right Leaning Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.2% saturation with 310.528 hits . Analysis detected 3,371.48 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,123 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of 3% (25,454 of 26,155 speakers). This Jim Jordan is better (less manipulative) than 97.30% of the peer group. Jim Jordan
Speaker details
Total words: 1,123
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.7% percentile 5.1% BS Score8 analyzed videos1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 13.4% 13.4% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 12.8% 12.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 18.6% 18.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 6.9% 6.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 16.9% 16.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 3.3% 3.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 19.2% 19.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 12.9% 12.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 6.7% 6.7% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 6.0% 6.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 19.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 19.2% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Begging the Question: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 1.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 0.4% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 5.3% Slippery Slope: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 1.7% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst