Speaker summary
59% 10 analyzed articles/videos 837.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jim Himes results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 277 hits . Analysis detected 2,375.705 faulty-reasoning hits from 837.667 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of 4% (27,346 of 28,364 speakers). This Jim Himes is better (less manipulative) than 96.40% of the peer group. Jim Himes
Speaker details
Total words: 837.667
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.6% percentile 5.8% BS Score10 analyzed videos837.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 6.3% 6.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 11.5% 11.5% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Speaker 8.8% 8.8% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 8.4% 8.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 7.1% 7.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 3.2% 3.2% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 5.8% 5.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 4.5% 4.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 15.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 19.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 15.1%, sitewide 11.1% Ad Hominem: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 1.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 7.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 0.8% Halo Effect: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 3.7% Burden of Proof: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 0.4% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst