Speaker summary
57% 18 analyzed articles/videos 542.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeff Landry results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 153 hits . Analysis detected 2,082.234 faulty-reasoning hits from 542.667 analyzed words across 18 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.4% and a BS Rank of 5% (27,091 of 28,364 speakers). This Jeff Landry is better (less manipulative) than 95.50% of the peer group. Jeff Landry
Speaker details
Total words: 542.667
Article count: 18
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.5% percentile 6.4% BS Score18 analyzed videos542.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 6.7% 6.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 16.4% 16.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 16.9% 16.9% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 8.8% 8.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 9.2% 9.2% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 7.4% 7.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 10.2% 10.2% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 7.4% 7.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 12.4% 12.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 16.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 19.0%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 6.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 6.0% Straw Man: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 0.9% Burden of Proof: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 0.4% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Begging the Question: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst