Author summary
35%1 analyzed article/video446 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Meghan Friedmann results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 211 hits. Analysis detected 1,200 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,338 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of 83% (1,128 of 6,628 authors). This Meghan Friedmann is worse (more manipulative) than 83.00% of the peer group.
Meghan Friedmann
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
83%Meghan Friedmann (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,338
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

83% percentile
025507510083.0% percentile
5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.7%2.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 15.8%15.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 11.8%11.8%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Author 7.5%7.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 12.4%12.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 8.5%8.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 3.1%3.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 15.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 11.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Author 12.4%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.5%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 7.5%Burden of Proof: Author 7.5%, sitewide 0.4%Anecdotal: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Tu Quoque: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos