Speaker summary
41% 28 analyzed articles/videos 788 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Quote-first Misdirection , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 203 hits . Analysis detected 1,304.363 faulty-reasoning hits from 788 analyzed words across 28 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of 5% (27,169 of 28,364 speakers). This Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps is better (less manipulative) than 95.80% of the peer group. Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps
Speaker details
Total words: 788
Article count: 28
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.2% percentile 6.2% BS Score28 analyzed videos788 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 7.2% 7.2% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 12.8% 12.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 2.9% 2.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 8.1% 8.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 2.1% 2.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 5.3% 5.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 12.2% 12.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 16.0% 16.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 11.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst